Hall of Fame & Shame
Top sites scored by SlapMyWeb. Public domains only — anonymous, just the host. Sort by best, worst, or most recent.
- #4
aitextwatermarkremover.com
Speed 94SEO 94Mobile 10096 - #5Speed 95SEO 94Mobile 10096
- #6
www.biztechra.site
Speed 95SEO 100Mobile 10096 - #7
slapmyweb.com
Speed 90SEO 100Mobile 10096 - #8Speed 87SEO 100Mobile 9795
- #9Speed 88SEO 100Mobile 9895
- #10Speed 86SEO 100Mobile 9695
- #11
olivka.app
Speed 100SEO 88Mobile 10095 - #12
firefox.com
Speed 94SEO 84Mobile 10094 - #13
grandparkskyline.vercel.app
Speed 100SEO 100Mobile 10094 - #14Speed 84SEO 100Mobile 9494
- #15
calcbold.com
Speed 98SEO 100Mobile 10094 - #16
crawlinx.com
Speed 100SEO 92Mobile 10093 - #17
mozilla.org
Speed 95SEO 72Mobile 10092 - #18
klimatiservisi.com.ge
Speed 87SEO 94Mobile 9791 - #19Speed 94SEO 100Mobile 6091
- #20Speed 94SEO 72Mobile 10091
- #21
developers.google.com
Speed 99SEO 92Mobile 10091 - #22
orbixpay.lovable.app
Speed 92SEO 79Mobile 10090 - #23
www.yamaha.olsztyn.pl
Speed 98SEO 86Mobile 10090
How a site gets on this list
Every entry is a real audit of a real public URL. When someone runs a scan and chooses to make the result public, the host and its scores appear here — never the full URL, never anything behind a login, and never a page that was scanned privately. That is also why the list is not a ranking of the web: it is a ranking of the sites people chose to audit and publish, which skews toward sites someone already suspected had a problem.
What the number actually measures
The headline score is a weighted blend of eight scored pillars: speed 20%, SEO 18%, security 15%, mobile 12%, design 10%, accessibility 10%, best practices 8% and content 7%. A site can therefore sit near the top with a weak content score if it is fast and technically clean, and a beautifully written site can land low on a slow host. The per-pillar figures next to each entry are there so the headline number is never the whole story.
Reading the extremes
The top of the board is usually a small, static, well-hosted site — few third-party scripts, a real CDN, correct headers. The bottom is usually the opposite: a heavy theme, a stack of marketing tags, images served at full resolution. Sorting by Most roasted is the more useful view if you are trying to learn what actually costs a site points, because the failures repeat: missing structured data, no HSTS, no sitemap, oversized images.
Think you can beat this?
Prove it.
Scan your site and find out where it lands — the leaderboard only shows sites that opted in.
Run a free audit