Skip to main content
SlapMyWeb
International SEO

International Keyword Research

Finding the terms people actually search in each market, rather than translating your existing keywords.

International keyword research is finding the terms people search in each target market, in their own language, rather than translating the keywords that work in your first one. Direct translation misses how a market phrases the need — and volume, competition and intent for the same product can differ completely between two countries speaking the same language.

Definition

International keyword research is keyword research repeated per market rather than per language. The same product can be searched for with entirely different words in Spain and Mexico, or in the UK and the US, even though both pairs share a language.

The failure mode is translating a keyword list: a translated term may be grammatically perfect and still be something nobody types. Research has to start from the market — its own search data, its own competitors' pages, its own phrasing.

Why It Matters

A translated keyword list produces pages that rank for nothing. Getting this wrong is expensive because it is usually discovered only after the whole localised site has been written around the wrong terms.

Example

"Mobile phone" is the common UK term; the US searches "cell phone". A UK site translating literally into Spanish for the Mexican market would target "móvil" (Spain) when Mexico searches "celular".

Why translation is not research

The instinct is reasonable: you have a keyword list that works, you are entering a new market, so you translate the list. The problem is that a keyword is not a concept, it is the specific string a population types — and the mapping between concept and string is cultural, not linguistic.

Three ways it breaks. Regional vocabulary: Spain searches "móvil", Mexico searches "celular", and a translator given "mobile phone" will produce whichever their own dialect prefers. Borrowed English: in many markets the English term outranks the native one — German developers search "cloud hosting", not a translation of it. Different demand shape: the same product can be a high-volume commodity search in one country and a near-zero niche in another, so a page worth building in one market is not worth building in the next.

How to do it per market

Start from the market rather than from your list. Pull search volumes with the country and language actually set, not defaulted. Read the pages currently ranking there — they show you the vocabulary, the page type that wins, and how local competitors frame the product. Ask someone who searches in that market to look at your candidate terms; the ones that read as translated are obvious to a native speaker and invisible in a spreadsheet.

Then map intent to page before writing anything. Two markets frequently need a different page structure for the same product: where one searches for the category, another searches for the problem. Building the same site five times in five languages is the failure this step prevents.

The technical half that has to work anyway

Keyword research is wasted if the localised pages cannot be served and indexed independently. Each language or market version needs its own URL — a subdirectory such as /de/ is the usual choice and inherits the domain's authority. Every version in a set needs hreflang pointing at all the others including itself, with reciprocal return links; broken reciprocity is the most common hreflang error by a wide margin. The lang attribute has to match the content, and each page needs its own title and meta description in its own language.

Switching currency or language by IP address on a single URL is the pattern to avoid: search engines only ever see whatever the crawl location returns, so the other versions effectively do not exist.

How SlapMyWeb checks this

An audit cannot tell you which keywords a market searches — that needs market-level search data. What it can tell you is whether your localised pages are technically capable of ranking for anything: whether each language version has its own crawlable URL, whether hreflang is present and reciprocal, whether the lang attribute matches the content, and whether the localised pages carry their own titles and descriptions rather than the source language's. Those are the failures that make good keyword research worthless. Check the annotations with the hreflang checker.

Know the term.
Check your own site.

A free audit tells you whether this is currently costing you score points — and exactly what to change.

Run a free audit
Free foreverNo signupResults in 30s